A Second Konark: Wastage of Money & Resources

Editor’s Desk: Padma Vibhushan sculptor Raghunath Mohapatra’s ambitious proposal to construct a second Konark Temple on a 17-acre land at the cost of Rs 2,000 crore, has surprised many in Odisha, which is struggling to find its rhythm in economic recovery. Can the people of Odisha afford such a project and at whose cost? Who will get the actual benefits – Odisha Tourism or Raghunath Mohapatra himself?

We acknowledge the contribution and achievements of Shri Raghunath Mohapatra in no ambiguous terms. He deserves the kudos for bringing laurel to the state through his great artistic achievements. Odisha felt proud when he was awarded the prestigious ‘Padma Vibhushan’ on the eve of 64th Republic Day. But, his proposal, if becomes a reality, can hardly serve the interest of people in the state. Instead, the money should be spent on the development work, healthcare and poverty eradication programmes.

Raghunath Mohapatra’s proposal was discussed at a meeting chaired by Tourism & Culture, Planning & Coordination Minister Maheswar Mohanty on February 11 at the Secretariat. Mohanty sought opinion of Chief Secretary and other bureaucrats regarding the proposal. Mohapatra had also attended the review meeting on an invitation of Mohanty. Central RDC Aurobind Padhi had talked in favour of the proposal and agreed to build another Konark temple, which was built after 100 years of Puri Jagannath temple. In wake of improving tourism in Odisha, he suggested to build a mini Konark temple at another place.

At the meeting, the map of the proposed Konark temple prepared by ASI book was presented. The minister said that proposal will be discussed with Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik later along with the complete map for the temple. According to Mohapatra, a doyen of stone sculpture, the existing Konark temple will be ruined after some years and the condition of many idols and small temples at the premises of the main temple are on a decline.

It can be noted that the government has to bear the burden of around Rs 2,000 crore to complete the temple. According to Mr. Mohapatra, about 600-700 artists will be required for the construction of the temple. It can be completed in 8-10 years. He had suggested to use small stones in the temple instead of big stones used in the existing Konark. The original Sun Temple, which was built by King Narasingha Dev in 1238 AD, has been decaying very fast.

We must acknowledge the fact that our archaeological monuments are irreplaceable. We cannot create the same magic by replicating another monument to replace the old one. Be it Taj Mahal, Char Minar or Konark, they have their historical significance. A new structure, how beautiful it may be, cannot draw the same attention what they have been doing for centuries.

Ironically, the state government, which may face a tough time ahead while distributing Rice @ Re. 1 to BPL families and spend crores of money on various populist measures announced by Naveen Patnaik, may show its interest on Mohapatra’s proposal to build another Sun Temple, which will be the carbon copy of the first one. The goal is to drag the attention of overseas tourists. But, who on earth can claim that the new Sun Temple at Konark will be better and more beautiful than the existing one? It’s next to impossible. It would be highly appreciated if the government spends that money on the development of tourist spots across the state.

Comments

comments

One thought on “A Second Konark: Wastage of Money & Resources

Leave a Reply

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550  100-105  , 70-486   c2010-657   70-178   OG0-091   70-178   JN0-360   ICBB   1z0-808   300-075   200-125  , 70-346   000-017   JN0-360   350-050   1Z0-061   220-901   700-501   640-911   101-400   220-901   350-030   ITILFND   400-201   220-801   70-488   210-065   HP0-S42   350-080   102-400   70-417   70-270   3002   640-692   1Y0-201   AWS-SYSOPS   2V0-621   000-089   200-101   70-533   70-488   CAP   210-260   300-070   102-400   70-980   70-346   102-400   300-209   SY0-401