Relief to Bhandarkar, as SC quashes Rape Charges

TNI Bureau: In a huge relief to Bollywood filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar, the Supreme Court on Monday quashed rape charges leveled against him. He was accused of raping a struggling model-turned actress alluring her giving a lead role in his forthcoming films.

Bhandarkar had approached the apex court appealing that the procedure was not followed properly. Meanwhile, the victim Preeti Jain also told the court that she was not interested to take the matter to the court as it is already a 9-year-old case.

Preeti had alleged that Bhandarkar had raped her several times between 1999 and 2004 alluring her to marry and give her a chance in his movies. A Mumbai Metropolitan court in September 2011 had found some substance in Preeti’s complaint and directed the filmmaker to face the trial.

However, Bhandarkar was granted anticipatory bail in November last year by the magisterial court.

Comments

comments

One thought on “Relief to Bhandarkar, as SC quashes Rape Charges

  • November 5, 2012 at 6:29 pm
    Permalink

    This case is uncannily similar to the case against Swami Nithyananda–over a dozen times alleged‘rape’ over 5 years!
    Common elements – claims of false promises by the alleged victim, evidence of only victim taken by the police, no evidence to substantiate the charges…in Nithyananda’s case not only is there no evidence for the alleged victim but there is hard evidence to prove the alleged victim is lying and it is a malicious case.
    But in Nithyananda’s case, the facts seem to be even more starkly against the alleged victim – Arathi Rao alleges rape over 50 times across India and US over 5 years! But there is hard evidence to disprove that – according to her medical records procured from the US Court she has been carrying an incurable, highly contagious STD that spreads even through saliva not just sexual contact, and that too she has the STD at least a year before the alleged first incident of rape! The incidents she claims have discrepancies in date and place – she claims rape in Tamil Nadu while her medical records prove she is on the same day in US and Nithyananda according to the video records is in Karnataka in a public program. To add to this, her character also is questionable as her medical records show she has had extra-marital affair with a suspected HIV positive person.
    It is interesting also that Arathi Rao is not trying this case in USA (where also she claims multiple incidents of rape)? Is it that the laws are more stringent so she knows her case will not stand?
    In the case of Madhur Bhandarkar, the police had given a clean chit to him but the Court observed a trial is warranted. In Nithyananda’s case, the Court has from the beginning been questioning the police about their investigation and it is the police who instead of doing a fair investigation are suppressing evidence not in favor of them.
    One would think this should lead to a straightforward quash of the case against Nithyananda if just the hard evidence is considered and presented to the Court!

Leave a Reply

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550  100-105  , 70-486   c2010-657   70-178   OG0-091   70-178   JN0-360   ICBB   1z0-808   300-075   200-125  , 70-346   000-017   JN0-360   350-050   1Z0-061   220-901   700-501   640-911   101-400   220-901   350-030   ITILFND   400-201   220-801   70-488   210-065   HP0-S42   350-080   102-400   70-417   70-270   3002   640-692   1Y0-201   AWS-SYSOPS   2V0-621   000-089   200-101   70-533   70-488   CAP   210-260   300-070   102-400   70-980   70-346   102-400   300-209   SY0-401