Collection of Toll Taxes resented in Mayurbhanj

By Janaki Ballav Dash: The collection of toll tax at three places within a distance of 125 km on the National High Way 18 has been resented and described as arbitrary by the public in the Mayurbhanj district. Commuters have also complained about the harsh conduct of the gate staffs at the toll collection gates.

While it is justified enough on part of the NHAI to collect a levy so as to take care of the NH, it is equally unfair to collect a sum of Rs. 300 and that is also at three points within a short length of 125 km on the NH.

The NHAI has set up three toll tax collection gates one at Chandikhole, another in Panikoili and the third one in Sergarh within 125 km in NH 18 and collects a huge amount of money since a number of vehicles move across these gates every minute.  For every 24 hours these three toll gates collect around Rs 300/-from each vehicle.

It has also been complained that the tax collectors in these gates abuse and force commuters irrespective of the persons travelling in the vehicle.

Recently a freedom fighter coming from Nilgiri area in a private vehicle was abused by gate staffs. In another case a Mumbai based ex-defense personnel was also became prey of the harsh conduct of the gate staff.  They have complained that though they exhibited their Identity Card which confers them to be within the exempted category, the staffs did not heard them and collected tax claiming that they don’t have such directive from their higher authorities. The victims claim this behavior to be “disrespectful”.

Policy on collection of user fee is based on the provisions of National Highways Act, 1956 (48 of 1956) and National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008.

Some people have argued that while many authorities, who enjoy the tax exemption benefit are enough capable to pay, is it not unfair to collect three times within a short length of 125 km and that is also in such a bad manner by the gate staff?

As per reports, a Public Interest Litigation has been filed in this nexus, but the final hearing is not yet done.

Comments

comments

Leave a Reply

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550  100-105  , 70-486   c2010-657   70-178   OG0-091   70-178   JN0-360   ICBB   1z0-808   300-075   200-125  , 70-346   000-017   JN0-360   350-050   1Z0-061   220-901   700-501   640-911   101-400   220-901   350-030   ITILFND   400-201   220-801   70-488   210-065   HP0-S42   350-080   102-400   70-417   70-270   3002   640-692   1Y0-201   AWS-SYSOPS   2V0-621   000-089   200-101   70-533   70-488   CAP   210-260   300-070   102-400   70-980   70-346   102-400   300-209   SY0-401